"They're an imminent danger.""They're plotting to destroy us."
"They're a danger due to WMD."
"We must do something now."
Look, I know the public's memory is short, but this is ridiculous.
As an independent, I'm cursed with an intellectual malady: I'm obligated to carefully listen to, consider and respect both sides of a given issue. This puts me in the clear minority in today's political environment. I believe there were good reasons to go into Iraq, and there were good reasons to not go. On balance, I felt it was not worth it.
My reason -- Tensions in the Mid East have been high virtually forever, and we've never exactly been the most welcome of visitors, let alone as a military presence. To further and more aggressively occupy that area, with its 17th-century mindset and the intent of planting a Western-style democracy, seemed (and seems) like historically dangerous folly.
Now we're being told that Iran represents an imminent danger, and it's clear that we may indeed attack that country. I think it's reasonable for the American public to be less than thrilled with this possibility.
Who knows what President Bush is thinking? His presidency has been all over the map, from insane spending and refusal to guard our borders, to his steadfast protection of right-wing causes such as fighting stem cell research and abortion. If this guy is focused, I'd like to know on what.
If you tell me the administration is acting tough to intimidate Iran with the prospect of war without actually planning on following through, I'll buy into that. I believe strongly in Reagan's Peace Through Strength doctrine, and unfortunately we need to leave all options on the table. Not doing so would enforce the (correct) belief held by many of our enemies that we have become soft and weak.
But if the current rhetoric is simply a prelude to a war, the administration better have one hell of an effective, efficient plan of attack. And they'd better hope the American public buys into it, and that it works.
For the record, let's scare them; if we attack, it will be yet another mistake of historic proportions.
Is there anything in our recent military history that gives you confidence?
Do you trust Bush's instincts on this?
Do you trust his decision-making abilities against the possibilities of the next true World War?
Surely your memory is better than that.
...



